THE EXAMS POINTLEARN · PRACTISE · PROGRESS
Home / ResourcesMind Maps
THE EXAMS POINT / RESOURCE CENTRE

Different exams.
One place to begin.

Choose an exam and explore concepts through visual explanations, topic maps and revision checks. Open the full chapter notes whenever you need more detail.

THE VISUAL LEARNING STUDIO

See the idea. Understand the connection.

35 visual explanations across 29 chapters, with topic maps throughout the library.

Choose your examination

Study the expanded notes and the credited detailed textbook lessons. The current chapter index covers core topics; it is not a claim of exhaustive coverage of every examination syllabus. Check the official syllabus and primary references.

Ethics, Values and Integrity — lesson overview

Ethics and morality

Ethics is systematic reflection on how people ought to act and how actions, institutions, and character should be evaluated. Morality commonly refers to beliefs and practices about right and wrong.

A value is something considered important or desirable, such as fairness, loyalty, compassion, or efficiency. Values can conflict in a particular decision.

Legality and ethical justification are not identical. An action can meet a minimum legal rule while still raising questions of fairness, honesty, or harm.

Integrity and public trust

Integrity involves coherence between ethically justified principles and conduct, including when external monitoring is weak. It is more than maintaining a favourable reputation.

Honesty concerns truthfulness; accountability concerns answerability and responsibility; transparency concerns access to relevant information. These reinforce one another but are not synonyms.

A conflict of interest exists when private interests could improperly influence an official responsibility. The issue can exist even before actual corruption occurs.

Analysing a dilemma

Identify stakeholders and relevant facts before choosing an action. Separate established facts from assumptions and missing information.

Then identify competing duties or values, lawful options, likely effects, and reasons that can be publicly defended. Do not justify a choice only by whether it benefits the decision-maker.

For example, allocating scarce public benefits requires defensible criteria, consistent application, and a route for correcting errors, not personal favour.